While Team Fortress Classic was pretty fun, no one really cared about it quite as much as they did with Counterstrike. I think that if it hadn’t been for Team Fortress 2, Team Fortress Classic would’ve gone the way of the dodo.

This was NOT trolling. I think these are all franchises that needed their sequels to establish the reputations they currently have, and I stand by my post.

I know a lot of people who would disagree about Team Fortress. Street Fighter, yeah that’s a good one.

Because it feels more like  trolling post than anything. None of these games were “saved” by their sequels. You just listed a bunch of already AAA titles that had BETTER sequels. This article should be titled games that had better sequels.

I only agree with Just Cause and Ass Creed. If you’re gonna throw around the term “saved”, you have to mention something like Street Fighter. Nobody even knew what the original street fighter was. If it wasn’t for 2, we wouldn’t even have street fighter today.

Okay, okay, you’re right, sheesh. “Uncharted” was a great game. I just think the sequel attained a level of acclaim that was completely unique and elevated the franchise in a way the first one didn’t.

You’ll notice, I said all of this in the actual paragraph. And it’s also ranked number 10, which means it’s the LEAST dramatic example on this list.

Furthermore, explain to me how this article doesn’t make sense because one entry is perhaps SLIGHTLY overstated.

And lest you accuse me otherwise, I have played BOTH Uncharted games all the way to completion, so I do know what I’m talking about.

And uncharted 1 sold well over a million copies during a bad time in the ps3s life. The sequel didnt SAVE anything. Just expanded on its epicness and increased sales. Isnt that was a sequel should do? This article makes no sense.

Sad that we live in a world where sales mean more than actual gameplay.